?

Log in

Todd Alcott
18 March 2009 @ 07:03 pm




free stats

I am shocked, nay, stricken by the news of the death of Natasha Richardson. Back in the 1980s, she was, all by herself, a good enough reason for me to go see a movie. I loved her as Mary Shelley in Ken Russell's absolutely stark-raving-mad Gothic, then as Patty Hearst in Paul Schrader's movie of the same name, then in The Handmaid's Tale and again with Schrader in The Comfort of Strangers. I knew that if Natasha Richardson was in it, it was bound to be smart, daring and a little bit crazy. I regret not seeing her on stage in New York when I lived there and she doing O'Neill with Liam Neeson. I have nothing else to offer, except my deepest sympathy for her family.



Tags:
 
 
 
Todd Alcott
12 January 2009 @ 03:23 am





I noted the other day the passing of William Zantzinger. What did William Zantzinger do, you might ask. Well, every Bob Dylan fan knows the answer to that -- "William Zantzinger killed poor Hattie Carroll, with a cane that he twirled 'round his diamond-ring finger." "The Lonesome Death of Hattie Carroll" is the high-water mark of Dylan's "protest songs" era, a compelling, crushing indictment of careless racism and social injustice (Zantzinger was sentenced to a mere six months for killing Carroll in a drunken rage).free stats

I mention the lonesome death of Mr. Zantzinger here because, a few years back, I was listening to a version of "Hattie Carroll" from one of Dylan's many live albums, and I suddenly thought "Wait -- this is a real guy." William Zantzinger is a real guy." Dylan recorded this song practically on the day the events unfolded, but he's still singing the song in concert thirty, forty years later. In the song, Dylan paints William Zantzinger in all shades of ill repute, presents him in terms of lofty wealth and political connections, the better to contrast him to his victim, poor Hattie Carroll, who lived a simple, spare, selfless life of servitude and motherhood.

And it hit me: Jesus, what must it be like to be William Zantzinger? Just imagine, everywhere you go, you introduce yourself, and in the mind of every person of a certain age, a little song starts playing.

YOU: "Hi, I'm William Zantzinger."
GUY: (thinks, humming) "William Zantzinger killed poor Hattie Carroll..."
(GUY slowly backs away, giving you a vaguely disgusted look)

Read more...Collapse )


 
 
 
Todd Alcott
25 December 2008 @ 11:21 am




click tracking


I interrupt the holiday festivities to note the passing of Harold Pinter. To "serious playwrights" of my generation, Pinter was second only to Beckett in terms of being a must-read. Back when I was trying to figure out what a play is, I read all the Pinter I could get my hands on. As the years went by, I sufficiently developed my talent to the point where I finally began to understand that I didn't have the slightest idea what Pinter was doing. I understood that his absurdist dramas were primarily about mood, that they weren't meant to be taken literally, but it was a good twenty-five years before I started to get a handle on the full measure of his accomplishment. Pinter himself consistently refused to discuss his work in any but the most practical terms ("you stand there and say this and pause here and then stick the knife in, and that's really all there is to it") but a piece last year from John Lahr in the New Yorker did an excellent job of putting the whole thing into something like a proper perspective.  To paraphrase Beckett's thoughts on Joyce, most playwrights write about something, but Pinter's plays are something.  They don't find drama in social interaction, they are drama itself.  They aren't there to merely entertain you, they're there to provoke an emotional reaction.  That sounds easy, but try it some time, try to create a drama that pushes past the conventions of the form to arrive at a place where the drama is the play itself, and maybe you too can end up with a Nobel prize.

For those thinking "Who the heck is Harold Pinter?" I suggest you begin with Betrayal, a mid-period piece of his, a relatively straightforward romantic drama with a simple, ingenious twist -- it is told backwards. For my illiterate readers, there is an excellent film adaptation starring Ben Kingsley and Jeremy Irons. Another good place to start is his electrifying anti-torture one-act One for the Road.  Or, you could watch him explain himself -- in his own kind of way -- in his Nobel speech.  And here is the young Ian Holm as Lenny in a scene from The Homecoming. And here is Donald Pleasence and Alan Bates in a scene from The Caretaker.  And here is some very late Pinter, a chunk of his adaptation of Peter Shaffer's (actually Anthony Shaffer's  -- see below) Sleuth with Michael Caine and Jude Law, directed by Kenneth Branagh, which well illustrates his way with threat and the power struggles that underlie the smallest conversational tidbits.

A few years ago, I had a devastating moment of self-definition in a hotel bathtub in Innsbruck. I was reading a little book of essays on Pinter, published in conjunction with his 70th birthday. One of the essays described him as England's last "important" writer, that is, a writer whose work isn't merely decorative, or "entertainment," but which has worth and resonance into the "real" world, the world of politics and world affairs, and which physically alters the shape of its form -- plays would never be quite the same after Pinter, and any theatrical moment that wrings uneasy menace from a silence will be forever known as "Pinteresque." My devastating moment of self-definition came when I suddenly realized, with an electric chill, that no one is ever going to publish a little book of essays on my 70th birthday, describing me as an "important writer." It was a shaming moment, but also a freeing one, because I realized that the job of Harold Pinter was already taken, there was no point in my pursuing it. I decided then that if I ever wrote a memoir, I would call it An Unimportant Writer.



 
 
 
Todd Alcott
06 November 2008 @ 01:34 am






I would be remiss if I did not mention the passing of Yma Sumac and Michael Crichton.  Sumac I knew through her gonzo lounge-exotica album Voice of the Xtabay, an LP I kept in my collection for many years.  She was a true one-of-a-kind entertainer: how many other Peruvian sopranos were there who dressed like an Incan princess and sang oddball "exotica" in New York clubs in the 1950s?

Michael Crichton was, of course, a much more easily-defined talent: he wrote bestsellers.  Lots of them.  The Andromeda Strain was one of my first "grown-up movie" movie-going experiences, I was probably 10 or so when my brother took me to see it.  It scared the hell out of me, images of the town full of dead people still linger in my mind.  I remember, even then, admiring the deft twists of its plot, and the way it criticized the fallibility of science.  I rushed to see The Terminal Man in spite of the fact that it was, of all things, a George Segal vehicle -- pardon, a George Segal thriller, and Futureworld, which was a kind-of sequel to Westworld, which set the tone for a number of Chrichton plots to come: rich guy takes a cool scientific principle and tries to turn it into a theme park -- with disastrous results.  Chrichton had a hugely commercial understanding of how to make science cool to the casual entertainment consumer and was the source of many successful adaptations, as well as some interesting misfires -- The 13th Warrior springs to mind, with its end-of-Act I moment where Antonio Banderas, after being kidnapped by a cannibalistic tribe, suddenly finds that he can understand their language.  The scene is handled beautifully -- Antonio is huddled by the fire, scared to death as the barbarians talk in their strange, brutish tongue, and then suddenly an English word pops up here and there, and then suddenly they're all speaking English.  The dramatic point of the scene is that Antonio can now understand them, but the screenwriters figured out how to express that the way it would seem to the protagonist, and I've always kept that scene in the back of my mind in case I ever need to steal it for something.  (The 13th Warrior is based on Crichton's Eaters of the Dead, which, well, if you don't think Eaters of the Dead kicks The 13th Warrior's ass around the block title-wise, I just don't know what to tell you.

UPDATE: Okay, okay, I didn't describe the translation-by-immersion scene from The 13th Warrior very well.  swan_tower , as usual, puts it much better below.  And this blog entry must surely be the largest gathering of 13th Warrior fans ever assembled.



Tags:
 
 
 
Todd Alcott
12 July 2008 @ 12:44 am






I gasped aloud this evening when I found out, several days late, that one of my favorite artists, Bruce Conner, died Monday.hitcounter

I had never heard of Conner before I wandered into the Museum of Contemporary Art in LA, one day in 2000. They were having a retrospective of his work, and I thought that it might be perhaps a cute little show of an artist of marginal importance. What a shock -- the museum was jam-packed with room after room of staggering masterpieces in all manner of media -- collages, assemblages, drawings, photographs, films and other, more conceptual works, less easily categorized.  My head felt like, well, like the guy in the collage above. 


Tags: ,
 
 
 
Todd Alcott
16 June 2008 @ 08:35 pm





hitcounter

I am greatly saddened to hear of the passing of Stan Winston. I don't think it's too much to say that his creature designs changed and extended the realm of the possible in movies, and provided the hook, the fuel and the content of, literally, millions of dreams and nightmares.

I once came close to working with him on a project and his designs were, without exception, creative, inspiring, efficient and excellent. They were easily ten times more cool than the script that I had written and they made me wish I could start over again to better serve his work.


Tags:
 
 
 
Todd Alcott
26 May 2008 @ 07:16 pm




hitcounter

I am greatly saddened to hear of the passing of Sydney Pollack.

He had a great gift for infusing genre pieces -- suspense thrillers and romances, generally -- with sophistication, wit, humanity and spontaneity. He got great performances from some of our greatest leading men and ladies, and as an actor gave several great performances himself.

My favorites of his directorial works are Jeremiah Johnson, Tootsie and Three Days of the Condor -- you couldn't find three more different scripts, and yet they all vibrate with intelligence, warmth and a sense of detailed, lived-in reality. Johnson and Condor also offer us two of Robert Redford's greatest performances. urbaniak  and I were, just last night, watching Spielberg's Munich, and I was reminded right off the bat how accurately it recreates the early-70s, gritty-realism vibe of Pollack's best work.

My favorite of his performances as an actor include Tootsie, Husbands and Wives, Eyes Wide Shut and, quite recently, Michael Clayton. He was a very rare kind of actor, an intelligent man who was both easily likable and physically threatening. I can't think of a false moment in any of his performances -- whenever he came on screen you knew the scene was in good hands.



Tags:
 
 
 
Todd Alcott
01 April 2008 @ 02:16 am






I came to Jules Dassin's work relatively recently, when I was researching heist movies and rented a dub-of-a-dub videotape of his French gangster classic Rififi. I knew nothing about the movie before watching it, only that it was supposed to be a classic and have a good heist in it. The tape I was watching was such a bad dub of such a bad print that the movie looked like it took place in the middle of the night in a Paris submerged under 50 feet of water. In those circumstances, the 25-minute silent heist sequence that forms the centerpiece of the movie took on an air of deep mystery and a kind of solemn strangeness. It felt weird and transgressive and dangerous, like I was watching a snuff movie or something.

Many years later I saw Rififi courtesy of one of Criterion's typically pristine transfers and saw that there is nothing particularly weird or mysterious about the movie, except that it's always weird and mysterious when a good movie gets made. The lighting in Rififi is crisp and lush, even occasionally pedestrian. The difference with the new transfer was that I could see the faces of the people in the narrative and witness the director's skill with actors. With a name like Jules Dassin, I assumed that the director was an off-brand French gangster-movie director, the guy French producers went to when they couldn't get Jean-Pierre Melville. I was wrong -- Dassin was an American, working in France when the McCarthyites chased him out. Rififi remains a classic, and I have also hugely enjoyed Brute Force and Naked City. Topkapi is a movie whose charms elude me, but I look forward to watching Night and the City, starring the just-now-deceased Richard Widmark. I don't necessarily believe in an afterlife, but it comforts me to think of Heaven like a kind of Valhalla, where whatever you were good at on Earth you get to do forever in the next world. In this case, I assume that Widmark, having signed on to star in some afterworld production, requested his favorite director or threatened to cross the street to make the movie with the competing studio.


hitcounter
 
 
 
Todd Alcott
29 March 2008 @ 03:16 pm





Robert Fagles was not a movie star, director, producer or screenwriter. He was merely a translator, but if it wasn't for his lucid, readable adaptations of The Iliad and The Odyssey my understanding of classic literature would be much poorer. Why not read one today?
hitcounter
Tags:
 
 
 
Todd Alcott
26 March 2008 @ 11:05 am






I can't say that the death of Richard Widmark, at 93, is much of a surprise at this point, but I must say I'm disappointed his death was not caused by being pushed down a flight of stairs by a giggling psychopath. And I say that with the deepest respect.

Rest in peace, big guy.hitcounter
Tags: